“The infinite vibratory levels, the
dimensions of interconnectedness
are without end.” ~ Alex Grey
are without end.” ~ Alex Grey
This leaves us with four
different conceptions of existence, within any or all of which some entity may
be understood to be. We can see how some entity may be understood to exist in
several of these simultaneously; the entities, while distinct, can be linked to
one another but can also exist independently. The entities in the objective
world all inter-relate with one another: they all exist within the same
objective world, at least as far as we can tell. In the same way, our
subjective world consists of entities which coexist and correlate within that
unique subjective world rather than within a range of them. Intersubjective
entities relate in a more complex way, insofar as the unique understanding of
the intersubjective symbol within each subjective observer's Cartesian theater
informs both the unique understanding of other subjective observers and also
the intersubjective meaning attached to the symbol itself - but again these
intersubjective entities coexist with one another on the same 'level' as it
were. Ideals, similarly, exist on their own 'level' - and yet we have already
stated, and can easily say in everyday experience, that entities existing
severally on discrete levels relate to one another. These metarelations between
things that exist in different senses can be seen as existing in some larger
dimension, in the same way as a succession of two-dimensional images can be
layered over one another in a third dimension to become a richer and truer
whole, and it is this dimension of existence, distinct from the first four,
that we call the transcendental. The metarelations of transcendental
reality are theoretically perceptible in the same way as the simple relations
of subjective reality, and the process of metaperception in this fashion is the
subject of the koan I quoted back at the beginning.
Now you have been given
access to a somewhat fuller expression of the seemingly simple expression 'I
can only be,' and a somewhat fuller elaboration within that context of the
opening koan, I have reached a point at which this narrative can pause. If you
are still confused, rest assured that this is because I still haven't begun to
properly express myself yet. Do not make the mistake of reading into that
refrain any sort of promise that 'proper expression' will ever be forthcoming;
but strive for the faith that sustains me - the faith that any
expression will, in the fullness of its flowering, become sufficiently
proper that it achieves some measure of intersubjective potential.
Feel
free to share your reactions to this. Let's make some Art.
No comments:
Post a Comment